
Moving a customer's aircraft by tug should be included in the aviation business's insurance description before the movement occurs. Hangarkeepers liability is a relevant coverage question because the aircraft belongs to someone else and may be in your care, custody or control. The actual policy still determines whether the operation, legal responsibility and damage are covered.
The tug introduces separate interests as well. A damaged customer airplane, injury to a person, damage to nearby property and damage to your own tug can involve different coverage parts. Do not assume a policy on the tug or a general premises certificate resolves every one of those losses.
At BWI, we help aviation businesses describe their ground handling services when requesting insurance options. Send the aircraft types and values, towing activities, locations and equipment details. Get your hangarkeepers insurance quote with BWI and identify customer aircraft movements specifically.
Describe Every Type of Aircraft Movement You Perform
Towing can be incidental to storage, part of maintenance, a paid ground handling service or an occasional favor. Describe the actual activity rather than assuming an unpaid movement falls outside the business exposure. The insurer needs to understand what your staff do with customer aircraft.
Identify the aircraft types, locations, approximate movement activity and supporting equipment. Explain whether movements occur inside a hangar, on a ramp, between facilities or in other areas. A submission based on stationary storage can be incomplete if employees routinely reposition aircraft.
Describe who requests and authorizes movement. The customer may give standing permission, a shop manager may direct it or another contractor may ask for assistance. Those arrangements help identify custody and responsibility. A request to help does not establish that your policy accepts every aircraft or location.
Operational procedures should be established by qualified personnel using appropriate aircraft and equipment guidance. Insurance review is not a towing manual. It should receive an honest description of the actual work and controls without unsupported claims that a tug type or staff experience eliminates the possibility of damage.
Separate the Customer Aircraft From the Tug and Surrounding Property
A ground incident can affect several owners. Identify which property belongs to the customer, which belongs to your business and which belongs to another tenant or airport. The relevant coverage may differ for each item even though the damage happened in one movement.
Kinsale's aviation ground operations overview identifies hangarkeepers protection as a category addressing customer aircraft in custody, including ground movement. That is a primary program overview, not confirmation of terms under a BWI placement. The actual policy, conditions and allegations determine the response.
Use the following map to organize the questions. It does not guarantee a covered event or assign legal fault.
| Possible damage | Interest involved | Coverage question |
|---|---|---|
| Customer airplane | Aircraft owner and any financial interests | Hangarkeepers terms, custody and legal responsibility |
| Your tug or tow equipment | Your business property | Equipment or property coverage, values and exclusions |
| Nearby airplane | Another aircraft owner | Custody relationship and applicable liability section |
| Hangar door or other property | Building or property owner | Premises or operations liability and relevant exclusions |
| Injury to a person | Employee, contractor or other person | Applicable liability or employment related protection |
| Customer downtime | Financial allegation after the event | Specific loss of use or other wording rather than assumed reimbursement |
Know When Custody Starts and Ends
A customer's presence does not automatically decide whether an aircraft is in your custody. Identify what the business agreed to do, who controls the movement and who handles the equipment. The actual relationship and wording need review rather than a rule based only on whether the owner is watching.
If your staff move aircraft for a maintenance shop, landlord or another tenant, explain that arrangement. The entity ordering the tow may not own the aircraft. Identify the customer, operator and other businesses involved so the insurer understands the service chain.
Record the handoff after movement. Where the aircraft is placed, who secures it and who accepts custody can matter to the factual account. A successful tow followed by unclear parking or access responsibility creates another potential issue that should not disappear from the operating description.
Contracts and work orders should match the real service. Qualified counsel can review custody, indemnity and other responsibility provisions. Insurance should be compared with those obligations, not assumed to fund every promise a work order assigns to the ground handler.
Review Per Aircraft and Combined Exposure
The value of one aircraft is important, but a movement can also affect nearby airplanes or property. Describe the largest values handled and the potential concentration in the work area. Do not choose a limit solely from the value of the airplane most often towed.
Review the actual limit structure, any per aircraft or other sublimit, deductibles and applicable conditions. A total limit shown on a certificate may not explain every restriction. Obtain a plain language comparison of the relevant terms before assuming the entire figure is available for each affected aircraft.
The business should also identify seasonal or operational changes. A new high value customer, different aircraft mix or expanded hangar occupancy can alter the exposure. Update the submission rather than treating a familiar tug and staff as proof that nothing material changed.
There is no universal minimum limit or premium range in this article. Appropriate protection depends on the actual operation, contracts, values and available terms. We can help organize those facts when requesting options, without promising a particular insurer outcome.
A Hypothetical Tug Movement Between Two Tenants
Imagine a hypothetical maintenance business asked to move a customer's airplane from its shop to a neighboring tenant's hangar. The business normally tows only within its own work area. The receiving tenant will later position and store the aircraft.
Before treating this as an ordinary repeat movement, the business should identify the destination, route, permission and custody handoff. The insurer needs an accurate service description, while qualified operational personnel need to decide whether the movement can be performed appropriately with the actual equipment and conditions.
The parties should clarify who accepts the aircraft at the destination and who is responsible for securing it afterward. The request may come from a customer representative rather than the legal owner. Keep the authorization and handoff record clear rather than relying on an informal assumption that the neighboring tenant will handle everything.
The example does not predict a claim or say every movement beyond a shop door needs a new policy. It shows why a change in location and custody should be recognized. The accepted terms and operating scope need to match the work the business actually performs.
Training and Equipment Information Support the Submission
Provide the information requested about staff roles, training and procedures. Identify who may operate tugs and who supervises or assists under the business's operational plan. Avoid unsupported assertions that every employee is qualified merely because the company owns towing equipment.
Keep equipment identification and maintenance information appropriate to the actual operation. A change in tug, towbar or aircraft type may require a different operational assessment and should be disclosed where relevant to the insurance description. Do not assume a method suitable for one aircraft automatically fits another.
The insurance request can describe the business's process for preventing unauthorized movement and handling exceptions. For example, who confirms that a requested aircraft is within the accepted service and who stops work if the plan changes? The process should be realistic enough that staff can actually follow it.
These details help an insurer understand the operation. They do not guarantee coverage or substitute for qualified technical guidance. Keep insurance communication focused on facts and accepted responsibilities rather than presenting a procedure document as proof that a loss cannot occur.
Read the Customer Agreement for More Than a Deductible
A service agreement can require reimbursement for damage, storage, substitute aircraft, lost use or other expenses. Those obligations may differ from covered legal liability. Identify them before assuming hangarkeepers insurance will pay every financial consequence of a towing incident.
Review indemnity, defense, waivers and releases with qualified counsel. Do not sign away rights or accept a broad payment obligation solely because the customer requests a standard form. The insurance review should compare the actual wording with available protection.
If the customer requests additional insured status or other evidence, obtain the legal names and complete requirement. A certificate holder designation does not itself create protection, and certificate wording cannot expand the policy. Verify any supporting endorsement and its scope.
Our hangarkeepers liability information provides broader context. A business performing towing should still disclose that service explicitly, including locations and aircraft values, rather than relying on a generic storage description.
Handle an Incident as an Evidence and Claims Process
If damage is suspected, protect people and prevent further damage where safe, then follow the relevant reporting instructions. Preserve the aircraft condition, equipment, photographs, work order, authorization and factual timeline. Qualified personnel should determine any technical inspection and whether further movement is appropriate.
Notify the relevant insurer promptly under the policy and provide what is known without guessing at uncertain facts. Do not promise the customer full reimbursement or admit legal responsibility before obtaining appropriate claim guidance. A factual acknowledgment of the event is different from agreeing to every alleged consequence.
Keep damaged parts and equipment available as instructed. Before authorizing repairs, disposal or a settlement, check the insurer's inspection, cooperation and consent requirements. The customer's desire for an immediate return to service should be coordinated with the actual claims process.
Separate aircraft damage, tug damage and downtime allegations in the record. They can require different coverage review even if reported together. Preserve evidence for all affected interests and keep communications consistent rather than assuming the first claim reference resolves every issue.
A Customer Aircraft Movement Insurance Checklist
Use this list when adding towing services, taking on different aircraft or expanding beyond the usual work area. It supports a complete insurance description rather than a substitute for technical towing procedures.
- Describe storage, maintenance and towing services with actual locations and custody arrangements.
- Identify aircraft types, largest values and possible combined exposure.
- List tug and tow equipment ownership and relevant staff roles.
- Review policy limits, sublimits, deductibles and accepted operations.
- Compare customer indemnity, damage and downtime obligations with actual protection.
- Establish authorization, handoff, incident reporting and evidence preservation responsibilities.
Questions About Hangarkeepers Insurance and Towing
Does Hangarkeepers Always Include Towing?
Do not infer the answer from the coverage name alone. Disclose the actual movement service, locations, aircraft and equipment, then review the issued terms. Primary program overviews identify towing as a relevant hangarkeepers activity, but they do not establish every policy's acceptance, exclusions or conditions.
Does the Customer’s Hull Policy Remove Our Exposure?
Do not assume it does. The customer's property protection and your business's potential liability are different interests. Recovery rights, agreements and policy terms can matter. Review your own arrangement for the service rather than relying on the owner's statement that the airplane is insured.
Is the Tug Policy Enough?
A policy protecting the tug does not automatically insure damage to a customer's aircraft or every injury arising from the operation. Identify the relevant property and liability sections separately. The business needs a clear explanation for the tug, aircraft in custody and other affected interests under the actual terms.
What if the Owner Directs the Movement?
Describe who operates equipment, controls the movement and accepts responsibility. The owner's instruction does not automatically determine custody or remove your liability. The actual facts, agreement and policy wording require review. Avoid a blanket assumption that an owner watching or giving directions makes the business fully protected.
Will Insurance Pay for Every Day the Aircraft Is Unavailable?
Do not assume all downtime is included. Review any applicable loss of use or other financial loss wording and the customer's contractual demands. A liability limit alone does not explain that scope. Identify the actual allegation and relevant policy rather than promising unrestricted reimbursement.
Get a Hangarkeepers Towing Quote From BWI
At BWI, we can help you present customer aircraft movements when requesting aviation insurance options. Send your service description, aircraft types and values, locations, tug details, custody arrangements and customer requirements. Explain movements outside the usual work area and any obligations for downtime.
Review our commercial aviation insurance information, then get your hangarkeepers insurance quote from BWI or call 866 788 6291. Confirm accepted protection before expanding the service. Coverage depends on the issued policy and endorsements; a request does not bind insurance.
Continue Reading

