Three workers standing near an industrial inspection drone. Before hiring an independent drone pilot, review the operating arrangement and insurance for both businesses. Identify who contracts with the client, who supplies the aircraft and who will perform the flight. Receiving a subcontractor's certificate is useful evidence, but it is not the whole review. The hiring […]
Drone, controller, cameras and detachable photography equipment arranged on a table. Before agreeing to a waiver of subrogation in a drone service contract, identify the party, policy and work the request concerns. Send the complete clause for review before signing. A waiver request is a question about recovery rights under the relevant arrangement, not simply […]
Hard hat wearing drone operator at a construction site. If a drone client requires primary and noncontributory insurance, send the exact contract language for review before accepting the job. The phrase concerns how relevant insurance is intended to interact. It is not simply another way to request a higher limit or add the client as […]
Drone operator wearing a hard hat at an industrial site. A drone client's request to be an additional insured for one project should be reviewed against that project's parties, work, location and dates. Send the actual requirement before promising the wording. A single job request can still involve questions about preparation, repeat visits and work […]
Compact camera drone in flight. When a drone client sends several company names for an insurance certificate, ask what role each entity has and what protection it requests. Do not assume that every name belongs in the certificate holder field or that listing a corporate group automatically addresses all its members. A project may involve […]
White low wing airplane parked near mountains. After selling an airplane, keep a complete copy of the insurance and transaction record instead of deleting the file once the refund arrives. You may later need to identify a policy term, explain the handoff dates or report a demand involving something that happened while you owned the […]
Red and white low wing airplane on an airport surface. When an aircraft insurance application asks about business use, describe the actual trips rather than selecting a label and hoping it fits. Explain who travels, whose business the trip serves, who owns the airplane and whether money or another benefit changes hands. Those facts help […]
Before offering an aircraft ride for charity, review the exact proposal with the insurer and resolve the applicable operating rules. A donated flight, auction prize, fundraising event and volunteer transportation mission are different arrangements. Calling the purpose charitable does not answer the insurance or regulatory questions by itself.
Start before the flight is advertised or promised. Once a charity has printed a prize description or accepted donations, changing the terms becomes harder. The insurance review should describe who pays, who selects the passengers, who operates the aircraft and what the organizer expects you to provide.
At BWI, we can help present the flight as it will actually occur. Request an aircraft insurance quote from BWI and send the proposed event or auction description, aircraft, pilot and any insurance requirements. Do this before committing to a particular limit, endorsement or flight date.
Write a short account of how the ride will be offered. Is it a prize sold at auction, a sightseeing event with several flights, a free introduction arranged by an organization, or transportation for a person receiving assistance? Explain the connection between the flight and any donation or payment.
Identify the organizer and the entity that will receive the money. State whether the pilot or owner receives reimbursement, fuel, promotional consideration or another benefit. Do not omit a payment because it is described informally as covering expenses.
Give the proposed passenger selection process and number of flights. A single winner choosing a future date is different from an event where members of the public line up for rides. If details remain undecided, identify them as open questions instead of describing the simplest possible version.
The purpose of this description is not to choose a favorable label. It is to give the relevant advisers and insurer enough facts to evaluate the real proposal before it becomes a public promise.
A fundraising flight may involve a donation associated with the ride. A volunteer transportation mission may instead be organized through a public benefit flying group with its own pilot and insurance requirements. Review the arrangement you actually intend to join.
Do not apply one organization's rules or insurance statements to another. Obtain the current participation documents directly from the organization, including any requested limits, evidence of insurance and role descriptions. Ask who is responsible for confirming compliance.
Likewise, do not assume an event liability policy protects every aircraft owner and pilot. Identify what the organizer's arrangement is intended to address and review your own aircraft interests separately.
BWI's aircraft insurance overview is the broader starting point for owner coverage. A charitable purpose needs a specific description because the people, payments and event structure can differ significantly from ordinary personal flying.
Complete this sheet before agreeing to supply the ride. It gives the organizer a practical list of decisions without suggesting that a particular answer guarantees acceptance.
Keep the final description with the insurance correspondence. If an organizer later changes the fundraising format, use the same sheet to show what has changed.
| Decision | Information to record | Review needed |
|---|---|---|
| Offer | Auction prize event ride or volunteer mission | Actual activity rather than charity label |
| Money | Donations reimbursement and other benefits | Applicable operating rules and policy use |
| Parties | Owner pilot organizer and beneficiary | Relevant interests and requested wording |
| Passengers | Selection number and any special arrangements | Actual exposure and operational suitability |
| Timing | Date weather flexibility and expiration of offer | Insurance term and postponement plan |
| Documents | Agreement promotional copy and certificate request | Promises made before the flight is offered |
The FAA has a specific rule for certain charitable nonprofit or community event passenger flights. Determine through appropriate regulatory guidance whether it applies and what other requirements concern your proposal.
Do not use this article as a complete eligibility checklist or assume every donated ride fits that rule. The actual flight format, aircraft, pilot and payment facts matter. Obtain qualified guidance for an auction prize or unusual arrangement before promising it.
Keep the regulatory decision separate from insurance acceptance. A flight that meets applicable operating rules still needs to fit the actual policy. Conversely, an insurance response does not authorize a flight under the aviation regulations.
Avoid copying a prize description from another fundraiser as evidence that the arrangement is permitted. The other pilot may have had different qualifications, approvals, aircraft or insurance. Start with the facts of your own proposed ride.
Send the insurer the full description of the activity, including any money or reimbursement. Ask how the proposed use fits the policy and whether any change or confirmation is needed. Do not decide that a pleasure and business description settles a fundraising operation without review.
Identify the actual pilot and any alternate. Provide requested experience and qualification information. If the organizer hopes to use several aircraft or substitute pilots, describe that plan before the event rather than assuming acceptance follows the original pilot.
Ask about relevant passenger liability terms and the limits under consideration. Review the actual documents and any requested conditions. A total liability figure alone may not explain the way the offered arrangement applies to the people on board.
If the aircraft is borrowed, rented or jointly owned, obtain the appropriate owner permission and insurance review. Being willing to donate your own time does not establish authority to commit someone else's aircraft or policy.
A charity may supply a volunteer agreement, event participation form or insurance requirement. Read the complete document before signing. It may request more than evidence of an existing aircraft policy.
Send the insurance language and exact entity names for review. If the document requests additional insured status or another endorsement, ask whether the requested terms are available for this activity. Do not promise them simply because the organizer says every volunteer signs the same form.
Have contractual responsibility and indemnity provisions reviewed by an appropriate legal adviser. An insurer's willingness to consider an endorsement does not decide whether every obligation in the agreement is suitable for you.
If the organizer says its own insurance protects you, obtain the relevant documents and have your position evaluated. Avoid treating a verbal assurance or an event certificate as a complete statement of your personal and aircraft coverage.
Use clear, accurate promotional copy after the necessary reviews. The description should leave room for appropriate scheduling and operational decisions. Avoid an unconditional promise to fly on a particular date or route regardless of circumstances.
If the accepted plan limits the number of passengers, aircraft or activity, ensure the offer does not suggest something broader. A description promising several family members a flight can create a different expectation from a single seat prize.
Have the organizer communicate material conditions before accepting the donation or bid. Appropriate legal guidance can help with the terms. The insurance task is to keep the advertised offer consistent with what was actually submitted and accepted.
Retain the final published description. A draft email may show one arrangement while the auction catalog shows another. The file should make clear what the public was offered and what later changes were agreed.
Consider an owner offering a local ride as an auction prize. Before the auction, the owner obtains the relevant operational guidance and reviews the precise proposal with the insurer. The charity uses the agreed description and scheduling terms.
After winning, the passenger asks to turn the ride into transportation to another city and offers to pay additional fuel costs. That is a changed proposal. The owner should not assume the earlier review follows the charitable connection into a different mission.
The owner instead explains that the new request needs its own review. If it cannot be accommodated, the parties use the agreed prize terms and appropriate advice to decide the next step. They do not improvise a reimbursement arrangement at the airport.
The same principle applies if a single ride becomes multiple flights or a different aircraft is introduced. The original charitable purpose remains, but the operating and insurance facts may have changed.
Agree in advance how dates will be selected, postponed or canceled. Appropriate operational decisions remain with the responsible people. A charitable obligation should not create pressure to launch in unsuitable conditions or with an unresolved aircraft issue.
If the flight moves into another policy term, check the current arrangement and any conditions again. A response tied to an earlier policy or different aircraft may not describe the postponed ride.
Keep organizer and passenger contact details, the accepted flight description and the relevant insurance records together. If an incident or potential claim occurs, contact the insurer promptly and follow its reporting instructions rather than making promises about payment or responsibility.
After the flight, record what actually took place and retain relevant documents. If you intend to offer rides regularly, describe that expected frequency in future insurance submissions instead of presenting each one as an isolated favor.
No label should replace a review of the facts. Explain the fundraising arrangement, donations, reimbursement and actual mission. Obtain the appropriate regulatory guidance and the insurer's response before offering the flight.
Complete the relevant reviews before committing to the public offer. That lets you correct the description or decline unavailable terms before a charity accepts money or promises the experience to a winner.
Do not assume that. Ask for relevant documents and review your aircraft arrangement separately. Event liability, the owner's aircraft damage interest and a pilot's personal liability are different questions.
Treat a material change in mission as a new proposal. Review it through the appropriate operational and insurance channels before agreeing. The original charitable connection does not settle a different transportation arrangement.
Obtain the actual request and exact legal name, then have the available wording reviewed. Avoid promising a particular status without understanding the role, activity and insurer's terms.
We can help present the actual charitable flight, including the organizer's request and the way the ride will be offered. Bring the details before advertising so the insurance discussion can inform the commitment you make.
Get an aircraft insurance quote from BWI or call 866 788 6291. Send the proposed flight description, pilot, aircraft and insurance requirements to start a specific review.
Before using an aircraft for a practical test, confirm that the insurance arrangement has been reviewed for the applicant, examiner and actual flight activity. Include any trip to the test location and the return flight. The examiner's appointment and the applicant's test eligibility do not explain every condition in the aircraft policy.
The checkride may last only part of a day, but the insurance questions can begin much earlier. A borrowed airplane may require owner permission and a separate personal insurance review. A test in your own airplane may involve an examiner's request for documentation. A weather delay may introduce a new date, aircraft or examiner.
At BWI, we can help present that complete plan. Request an aircraft insurance quote from BWI before the practical test with the aircraft, proposed examiner, applicant status and travel arrangements. Send any requested insurance wording while there is still time to review it.
State which certificate or rating the practical test concerns and who owns the aircraft. Explain whether the applicant has trained in this particular airplane and whether another person will operate it before or after the test. Those details make the request more useful than simply adding checkride to an email subject.
Provide the proposed date and location. If the examiner will meet you at another airport, include the repositioning flight and intended pilot. A policy review for the test does not automatically answer a different solo or ferry operation needed to get there.
If the airplane is rented, obtain the rental agreement and insurance requirements. If borrowed, obtain the owner's permission and relevant insurance review. A friendly arrangement still needs an accurate description of who may operate and what responsibilities the applicant has accepted.
BWI's aircraft insurance overview is the broader starting point for an owner. For a practical test, the application and policy should be considered against the actual activity and people involved.
Use a short activity plan to identify decisions outside the test flight itself. The table is a preparation tool, not a statement that a given insurer automatically includes or excludes each activity.
Have the appropriate aviation professionals resolve operational roles and qualifications. Then use those facts in the insurance discussion rather than trying to settle them by selecting a convenient insurance label.
| Activity | People and facts to identify | Question to resolve |
|---|---|---|
| Travel to the test | Actual pilot aircraft and purpose | Does the accepted arrangement address this flight |
| Preparation flight | Instructor applicant and activity | Is this instruction different from the test plan |
| Practical test | Applicant examiner and aircraft | Have use roles and any requests been reviewed |
| Discontinued test | Storage new date and possible changes | What must be updated before continuing |
| Return flight | Pilot and current qualification | Does the return plan meet current conditions |
| Later passenger flight | New privileges and proposed passengers | Has the changed operating plan been reviewed |
The FAA identifies a designated pilot examiner as an appointed individual performing an authorized examination role. Describe the practical test as such instead of assuming that a general instruction provision answers every examiner question.
Ask whether the policy has relevant wording about examination, evaluation, instruction or other persons operating the aircraft. Review definitions and exclusions as well as any pilot list. The actual policy may distinguish activities that pilots discuss casually using the same word.
If the examiner requests particular protection, obtain the request in its exact form. Permission to conduct the test, acceptance as a pilot and the person's own liability coverage should not be collapsed into one statement that the examiner is covered.
Avoid making a universal legal conclusion about who will be responsible if something goes wrong. PIC arrangements, the facts of an incident and liability are questions that require appropriate guidance. The insurance review should accurately describe the agreed roles without promising a predetermined outcome.
Start with the current policy and any individual pilot conditions. A student owner, private pilot adding a rating and experienced pilot completing another qualification may have different accepted arrangements. Submit the actual status instead of treating every practical test as the same risk.
Identify how the airplane will be operated before the test begins. If another pilot delivers it, have that operation reviewed. If the applicant flies to the examiner, confirm the separate regulatory and insurance requirements for that flight through the appropriate channels.
Review any training conditions that remain in effect. Do not assume the checkride replaces an insurance checkout unless that is the accepted arrangement. Ask what evidence the insurer needs and whether there is a separate step before a different operating privilege is recognized in the policy.
Where ownership is through an entity or shared arrangement, keep the owner and applicant identities clear. A person being tested in an LLC owned aircraft is not the same fact as that person individually owning the policy.
Ask the owner or operator to confirm that the proposed use and people have been reviewed under its insurance arrangement. Then review your own responsibilities under the rental or borrowing agreement. Those responsibilities may raise questions beyond the owner's physical damage coverage.
Consider a personal nonowned insurance review using the actual test and travel plan. Explain whether you will operate alone, with an instructor or with an examiner. Ask about relevant aircraft damage liability and personal liability terms rather than choosing a limit based only on the cheapest available premium.
Do not assume the owner's policy protects you simply because it protects the owner. Likewise, do not assume buying a nonowned policy erases every contractual obligation in the rental agreement. Send the relevant documents and ask how the actual arrangement responds.
If the aircraft changes, update the review. A replacement airplane may have a different value, configuration or agreement. The fact that it is available for the examiner does not establish that the earlier insurance discussion applies unchanged.
Ask what the examiner needs before the appointment. A request for evidence of aircraft insurance differs from a request for a specific endorsement or insured status. Clarify the distinction while the documents can still be reviewed and issued if available.
Send exact legal names and the complete requested wording. Do not edit a certificate yourself or promise that a person can be added in a particular capacity without review. The request should identify the role and interest the proposed insurance is meant to address.
Ask whether the examiner has a document submission deadline and who should receive the response. Keep the issued documents with the test planning file and check for errors in aircraft identity or dates.
If a requested term cannot be provided, resolve that before the test day. Appropriate next steps may involve clarification, another available arrangement or rescheduling. A certificate handed over at the last minute cannot resolve a requirement the insurer never accepted.
A practical test can move to another date for weather, aircraft availability or examiner scheduling. Report changes that affect the reviewed insurance facts. The most consequential may be a substitute examiner, replacement aircraft or a different pilot delivering the airplane.
If the current policy renews between the original and new dates, review the new documents rather than relying solely on an old confirmation. Keep the practical test request tied to the policy term and conditions that will actually be in effect.
A discontinued test can also leave the airplane away from home. Describe any extended storage, maintenance or return flight instead of treating the pause as an administrative matter only.
Avoid letting scheduling pressure turn an unresolved question into an assumption. The effort already invested in arranging the test does not determine whether a changed insurance arrangement is accepted.
Consider a student owner who plans to take a practical test away from the home airport. An instructor flies the airplane there with the applicant, and the applicant hopes to return as a newly certificated pilot after passing.
Before the trip, the owner reviews the outbound operation, test and proposed return. The discussion identifies any insurance condition that must be completed or documented before the return plan changes. The owner also establishes the appropriate operational requirements with the instructor and examiner.
Suppose the test is postponed or not completed. The return plan should already account for that possibility. It is unhelpful to discover at sunset that everyone assumed a different person would fly home.
After a successful test, the applicant does not assume that taking passengers or using a different aircraft is automatically addressed by the earlier arrangement. New privileges and current insurance conditions are reviewed together for the next intended operation.
Retain the current insurance documents, relevant confirmation, rental or borrowing terms and any examiner request. Keep them distinct from the aircraft maintenance and applicant qualification records, although all may be needed during preparation.
Use a short checklist showing which items are complete and who is responsible for each unresolved item. The applicant should know whom to contact if a different aircraft or examiner becomes necessary.
After the practical test, preserve any completion information requested by the insurer and update future operating plans. A clear file helps the owner move from test preparation to the next activity without relying on an outdated student or training description.
Review the actual policy and describe the activity as a practical test. Do not assume an instruction provision answers every examination or evaluation question. The applicant and examiner roles should be clear in the request.
The actual wording and requested protection determine the review. Obtain the examiner's precise request and ask how the insurer addresses it. There is no universal naming instruction that fits every owner or nonowner arrangement.
Ask about your own position separately from the school's insurance. Review the rental agreement and consider an appropriate nonowned insurance discussion. A school's policy number alone is not a complete explanation of your protection or obligations.
Update the insurance review with the replacement aircraft and agreement before relying on the change. Also resolve the separate operational and examiner requirements. Availability does not establish that every earlier approval transfers.
Plan that possibility beforehand. Confirm the applicable operational requirements and any insurance conditions or completion evidence. A successful test does not automatically explain every term of the aircraft policy.
We can help present the whole checkride plan, including the test aircraft, examiner request and travel before and after the appointment. Start with the actual operation so the insurance review addresses more than a date on the calendar.
Get an aircraft insurance quote from BWI or call 866 788 6291 before the practical test. Send any rental terms or requested insurance wording while there is time to review the available options.
Before adding a safety pilot to an aircraft arrangement, identify what that person will actually do and have the relevant insurance terms reviewed. The phrase safety pilot can describe a required crew role during simulated instrument flight, an insurer requested companion, a mentor or simply another pilot riding along. Those descriptions should not be used interchangeably.
The useful insurance question is specific: who will act in each operating role, in which aircraft, for what purpose and under what accepted conditions? Listing another pilot may be one part of the answer, but it does not by itself explain that person's liability protection or every requirement for the flight.
At BWI, we can help present the proposed two pilot arrangement. Request an aircraft insurance quote from BWI with both pilots' information and the actual purpose of the flight. Explain whether this is instrument practice, transition experience or another operation before anyone relies on the label safety pilot.
Start with the planned duties. Will one person use a view limiting device while the other performs the required lookout role? Will an experienced pilot accompany a new owner under an insurer's condition? Will a CFI provide instruction, or will a friend simply observe?
Have a qualified instructor or other appropriate aviation professional establish the regulatory and operational requirements. Then describe the arrangement accurately for insurance. Do not choose a role solely because it appears easier to fit into a pilot clause.
The FAA's simulated instrument flight rule includes specific safety pilot requirements. It is the primary starting point for that operation. An insurance requirement using similar language may still need its own explanation in the actual policy or endorsement.
Keep the planned role clear for every phase. A person who only observes during one flight might operate the aircraft on the return trip. The insurance submission should describe both activities instead of letting the outbound label stand for the entire day.
The following comparison is a planning tool. It does not decide legal qualifications or state that one insurance form applies to every example. Its purpose is to direct the review to the actual activity.
| Arrangement | Fact to establish | Insurance question |
|---|---|---|
| Simulated instrument practice | PIC and required crew roles | How are both people addressed for the described operation |
| Insurer requested companion | Exact condition and companion qualifications | What must be met and documented before solo operation |
| Instruction | Instructor duties and training purpose | Are instructor use and relevant insured interests addressed |
| Informal mentoring | Whether mentor operates or only observes | Does the described role match the accepted pilot and use terms |
| Alternate flying on a trip | Who operates each leg | Has each proposed pilot been reviewed for their own operation |
Supply the information requested for each pilot, including certificates, ratings, experience, recent flying and intended duties. Do not assume one person's qualifications compensate automatically for the other's missing insurance condition. The insurer needs to evaluate the actual combination.
If the arrangement is intended to satisfy a policy condition, read the complete wording. Identify who may serve in the companion role, any required training and what happens after the specified period is completed. Ask how completion should be recorded.
An experienced friend is not automatically the same as an accepted instructor or mentor. Likewise, a CFI credential alone does not establish acceptance for every aircraft and task. Present relevant model experience and the proposed activity rather than relying on a title.
BWI's aircraft insurance overview explains the broader owner discussion. For two pilot flights, the details should show why the second person is there and what each person is expected to do.
An owner wants to know whether the aircraft arrangement permits the proposed pilots and use. Each pilot may also want to know whether the policy addresses their own liability. Those are related questions, but they should be asked separately.
Review the definitions of insured persons, exclusions and relevant endorsements using the actual role. Do not assume a person has every protection simply because the insurer accepts that person as a pilot or because the owner gives permission.
If the second pilot requests particular insured status or other wording, obtain the request in writing and have it evaluated. Avoid promising to add someone in a particular capacity without understanding the interest and available terms.
A nonowner policy may be worth discussing for an individual who flies aircraft they do not own. Describe the safety pilot or mentoring role expressly when requesting that review. Do not assume a general renter product automatically addresses every two pilot activity.
The pilots should understand who is responsible for operating the flight and how the duties are allocated. Obtain appropriate instruction or regulatory guidance for PIC and logging questions. An insurance article should not be the basis for a creative arrangement designed only to generate logbook time.
For the insurance submission, use the actual agreed roles and anticipated control of the aircraft. If those roles alternate, explain when and how. A statement that both are PIC may not give an underwriter enough information about who will do what.
Do not change the agreed role casually in the cockpit if the accepted insurance arrangement depends on it. If a different plan is needed, resolve the operational and insurance questions before treating the revised plan as authorized.
Keep any requested evidence accurate. A log entry, training record and insurance completion confirmation can serve different purposes. One should not be drafted to imply that all three decisions have been satisfied when only one has been completed.
Medical requirements depend on the person's actual role and the applicable rules. The FAA's current BasicMed resource includes qualifying required crew roles. Use current official guidance rather than an older article that may describe a previous version of the rules.
For insurance, state the qualification each person will use and ask how it fits the relevant wording. Do not infer that a regulatory change automatically revises a private policy or that one insurer's acceptance establishes another's terms.
Avoid giving a medical conclusion to a friend as part of arranging the flight. If there is uncertainty about eligibility or fitness, resolve it through qualified medical and aviation sources. An insurance response does not make that determination.
The owner can keep an operational status record without distributing private medical details. Record what must be confirmed for scheduling and retain sensitive supporting information through the appropriate process.
Read the proposed condition before selecting a companion or buying travel. Ask whether it specifies an instructor, mentor, particular experience or other acceptance. A description used by a training provider may not match the wording in the policy.
Clarify whether the companion must be present for all flight activity or only a defined phase, and how progress is documented. Do not invent an answer from a friend's policy. If the condition is unclear, obtain a specific explanation before operating under it.
Plan for substitution. A companion who becomes unavailable can delay the trip unless another suitable person is reviewed. Have the substitute's information considered before handing over the arrangement at the last minute.
When the required stage is completed, confirm the next accepted arrangement and retain the response. Completion of a training flight and a change in insurance status should not be assumed to occur automatically together.
Consider two friends arranging simulated instrument practice in one friend's airplane. They establish the appropriate operational roles with their instructor and review the insurance arrangement for the planned flight. The second pilot is there for the specific required crew task.
After landing away from home, the owner asks the other pilot to fly the airplane back alone. That is a different activity. The earlier review of a two pilot practice flight should not be treated as an answer about solo operation by the other person.
A clear preflight plan would identify any proposed role changes and include them in the review. If the return plan was not contemplated, the owner should resolve the relevant requirements before treating it as an accepted option.
The same reasoning applies to a mentor who is later asked to ferry the airplane or an instructor who will operate it without the owner. The person's credentials have not changed, but the operation has.
Prepare a concise brief containing the aircraft, purpose, pilots, agreed roles, relevant insurance conditions and any completion requirements. It should support the pilots' separate operational briefing rather than replace it.
Record who may authorize changes and what needs another review. Useful triggers include a substitute pilot, different aircraft, instruction replacing informal mentoring or a solo return flight. This keeps an accepted narrow arrangement from expanding through casual assumptions.
After the activity, retain requested completion records and correct any mistaken description while the facts are fresh. If the arrangement will become routine, describe that expected frequency at renewal instead of repeatedly presenting it as a one time exception.
Review the particular role and policy wording. Some arrangements may use a named pilot provision, while others require a different review. Do not assume either automatic acceptance or a universal naming requirement from the phrase safety pilot alone.
Ask that separately from pilot permission. Definitions, exclusions and endorsements determine the person's protection under the actual policy. Acceptance to participate in a flight is not a complete explanation of liability coverage.
Have the substitute reviewed against the actual condition before relying on the change. Experience and qualifications need to match the required role. Another pilot's informal opinion is not the insurer's acceptance.
Use current FAA guidance and the actual operational role to determine eligibility. Older articles may describe previous rules. Then review the person's qualification separately against the aircraft insurance wording.
Confirm what the accepted condition requires, how completion is documented and when the next arrangement takes effect. Do not rely on a guessed milestone or another owner's training experience.
We can help present the people, duties and aircraft so the insurance discussion addresses the flight you intend to make. Tell us whether the second pilot is required crew, an instructor or an insurer requested companion.
Get an aircraft insurance quote from BWI or call 866 788 6291 before operating under a new two pilot plan. Send any proposed pilot conditions and both pilots' relevant information.
Address
BWI Aviation Insurance Agency, Inc.
PO Box 847527
Los Angeles, CA 90084
Business Hours
Mon - Thu 6 AM to 6 PM Pacific
Friday 6 AM to 5:30 PM Pacific
Phone: (866) 788-6291
Fax: (951) 735-9301
Corporate: (800) 666-4359
admin@bwifly.com
Address
BWI Alaska office
4451 Aircraft Drive. Ste 220
Anchorage, AK 99502
Business Hours
Mon - Fri 8 AM - 5 PM AKST
Insurance Solutions
Aviation Insurance
CFI Insurance
Commercial Aviation Insurance
Drone Insurance
Hangar Insurance
Non Owned Aircraft Insurance
Private Jet Insurance
More from BWI
